History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roller v. Catlett
245 U.S. 632
SCOTUS
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. *633Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.

Mr. John E. Boiler pro sé. Mr. Budolph Bumgardner for defendant in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Roller v. Catlett
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Dec 10, 1917
Citation: 245 U.S. 632
Docket Number: No. 163
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.