Rolfe v. Fingerhut
98 N.J.L. 894
N.J.
1923
Check Treatment
Pek Cukiaji.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

*896For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Tren chard, Ivaltscii, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.