Rolfe v. Fingerhut

98 N.J.L. 894 | N.J. | 1923

Pek Cukiaji.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Tren chard, Ivaltscii, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.