No. 51 | Pa. | Jun 2, 1890

Per Curiam :

This case does not require discussion. The plaintiff had a *601full, adequate, and convenient remedy at law, and the court below committed no error in dismissing his bill for want of jurisdiction.

Decree affirmed and the appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.