History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rogoff v. O'Rourke
29 N.Y.2d 664
NY
1971
Check Treatment

Order affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the witnesses here involved were qualified to act as subscribing witnesses under subdivision 3 of section 135 of the Election Law, which does not require that such witnesses be enrolled voters in the county in which the petition is circulated.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson. Taking no part: Judge Bebgan.

Case Details

Case Name: Rogoff v. O'Rourke
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 8, 1971
Citation: 29 N.Y.2d 664
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.