Rogers v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

726 A.2d 258 | N.J. | 1999

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 309 N.J.Super. 630, 707 A.2d 1090 (1998).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

midpage