Rogers v. State

Dec 19, 1907
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
McClellan
McCLELLAN, J.

The affidavit on which the defendant was tried ‍​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‍was sufficient in its designation of him by initials; his name being averred to be unknown to the ‍​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‍affiant. The plea was not guilty, and there was no evidence adduced tending to refute the averment ‍​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‍of the affidavit that his name was unknown.- — Winter v. State. 90 Ala. 637, 8 South. 556. There was testimony intro*77duced ‍​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‍upon which the court was warranted in adjudging him guilty.

No error appearing in the record, the judgment is ‍​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‍affirmed.

Affirmed.

Tyson, C. J., and Haralson and Anderson, JJ., concur.