History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rogers v. State
29 S.E. 915
Ga.
1898
Check Treatment
Simmons, O. J.

There being no error of law complained of, there being evidence sufficient to support the finding of the jury, and the same having been approved by the trial judge, his judgment in overruling the motion for a new trial will not be disturbed. ,-

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Indictment for assault with intent to rape. Before Judge Hutchins. Gwinnett superior court. September term, 1897. L. F. McDonald, for plaintiff in- error. C. H. Brand, solicitor-general, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Rogers v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 28, 1898
Citation: 29 S.E. 915
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.