History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rogers v. Sibley
150 Mass. 180
Mass.
1889
Check Treatment
C. Allen, J.

The assignee in insolvency not only never had in his own possession the money deposited by the plaintiff with the register of insolvency, but was ignorant of the fact of the deposit till after final distribution of the funds in his hands had been ordered, and nearly completed. The plaintiff should have obtained an order of court for the assignee to make the payment to him. If the order for a final distribution to the creditors was inadvertently made, without providing for the repayment of the money advanced by the plaintiff, the plaintiff himself was to blame, and not the assignee. It would not be a reasonable construction of the statute (Pub. Sts. c. 157, § 137) to hold the assignee liable, and bound to make such payment, under the circumstances mentioned in the agreed statement of facts.

Judgment for the defendant affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Rogers v. Sibley
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Nov 27, 1889
Citation: 150 Mass. 180
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.