History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rogers v. Schneider
189 A.D. 954
N.Y. App. Div.
1919
Check Treatment

The learned County Court was too courteous and too complacent to the various irregularities which marked the trial of this case. The animosity of the attorneys explains but does not palliate their conduct of the trial. We think that in the interests of justice there should be a new trial for the error in permitting evidence as to the defendant’s signature to the application for her marriage license. (See folios 444, 445, 446 and 447.) Judgment and order of the County Court of Queens county reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Rogers v. Schneider
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 15, 1919
Citation: 189 A.D. 954
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.