History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rogers v. Rogers
54 A.D. 195
N.Y. App. Div.
1900
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

It may be that the affidavits objected to were not properly authenticated within the ruling of this court in Turtle v. Turtle (31 App. Div. 49). But that objection was not taken upon the hearing of the motion, and for that reason the defendant cannot avail himself of it here. The affidavits are sufficient to warrant the conclusion reached by the court below as to the right of the plaintiff *196to alimony and counsel fees, and the motion, therefore, was properly granted.

The order should be affirmed, ' with ten dollars, costs and disbursements. ■ . ■ . .

Present —Van Brunt,- P. J., Rumsey, Ingraham, McLaughlin and Hatch, JJ.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Case Details

Case Name: Rogers v. Rogers
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 1, 1900
Citation: 54 A.D. 195
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.