Rogers v. McKenna
96 N.J. Eq. 386
N.J.
1924
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Foster in the court of chancerj'.

For affirmance ■— Ti-ie Chibe • Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbaoi-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Busktrk, Clark, Mc-Glennon, Kays—15.

For reversal—None.