History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rogers v. Judd
8:07-cv-01705
M.D. Fla.
Feb 26, 2009
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION RUSSELL ROGERS,

Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: 8:07-cv-1705-T-26EAJ GRADY JUDD, PATRICK BENNEY,

SANDRA BARRETT, and RONALD ODOSKI,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R Upon due consideration, it is ordered and adjudged that Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine (Dkts. 58, 59, and 60) are denied without prejudice. This Court looks with disfavor on motions in limine which address evidentiary issues more appropriately raised at trial when the Court is in a better position to evaluate the merits of such issues within the context of the entire case and the parties’ theories of prosecution and defense. The parties shall address all disputed evidentiary issues in their trial briefs.

It is also ordered and adjudged that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. 56) and Motion to Compel Video Deposition for Use at Trial (Dkt. 57) are denied because they were filed long past the expiration of the discovery deadline of October 31, 2008, fixed in this Court’s Case Management and Scheduling Order entered April 17, 2008, at docket 25.

DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida, on February 26, 2009. s/ Richard A. Lazzara RICHARD A. LAZZARA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE COPIES FURNISHED TO :

Counsel of Record

Case Details

Case Name: Rogers v. Judd
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Florida
Date Published: Feb 26, 2009
Docket Number: 8:07-cv-01705
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.