History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rogers v. Dunn
172 Pa. 151
Pa.
1895
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

We find no error in this record. The binding instructions to find for the plaintiff were fully warranted by the testimony, and hence the judgment on the verdict should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Rogers v. Dunn
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Nov 8, 1895
Citation: 172 Pa. 151
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 124
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.