*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MICHAEL GUY ROGAN, Case No. 19 CV ‐ 1881 (PJS/LIB) Plaintiff,
v.
VIRGINIA MANDAC,
Defendant. Michael Guy Rogan, pro se. matter before in connection written by plaintiff
Michael Guy dated 13, 2020. 12. submitted this in 2, Report Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Leo I. Brisbois. recommends dismissing prejudice Fed. R. Civ. P. for prosecute, further recommends denying proceed (“IFP application”) conducted de novo review. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); R. 72(b). review, Court adopts initially July 17, ECF On September order explaining Rogan’s deficient because it had been because it failed *2 include a certified copy of trust fund account statement for the full six month period preceding the date the was filed. ECF Brisbois explained that if Rogan intended to go forward with the case, he must either submit a completed IFP or pay the filing fee within days. Rogan took no in to this order, and on R&R recommending dismissal of action. does not raise any specific objection to the but
merely asks the for “another chance at this.” As described above, however, alerted to the problems with his IFP more than four months ago, yet he still complete, application. his to the Court, gives no indication he will be able submit proper application near future or he will be able litigate his claims going forward. Under the circumstances, with dismissal prosecute will be prejudice, however, thus will be free refile his if when he better able pursue claims comply rules. foregoing, all files, records, proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. [ECF 11] is ADOPTED. 2. is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE R. prosecute. 3. proceed [ECF 2] DENIED as moot.
4. motion [ECF 4] DENIED LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated: February 2020 s/Patrick J. Schiltz Patrick J. Schiltz
United States District Judge