Rogala v. Syracuse Housing AuthorityRogala v. Syracuse Housing Authority
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries that she sustained when she fell while descending two concrete steps from a porch to the sidewalk at an apartment complex owned, operated and maintained by defendant. Plaintiff contends that defendant negligently created the dangerous condition when it reconstructed the steps in 1990 with different riser heights in violation of the State Building Code. During pretrial discovery, plaintiff sought certain “as-built” drawings prepared by the architect hired by defendant, but defendant was unable to locate the drawings. Plaintiff moved for sanctions based on defendant’s negligent spoliation of evidence. Plaintiff sought an order striking defendant’s answer or, in the alternative, an order precluding defendant from presenting any evidence regarding the physical condition of the area where she fell.
Contrary to plaintiffs contention, Supreme Court properly refused to strike defendant’s answer and did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion to the limited extent of precluding defendant from offering evidence of the drawings unless such drawings were provided to plaintiffs counsel for inspection 30 days prior to trial of the action. “In the absence of pending litigation or notice of a specific claim, a defendant