Roe Realty Company v. Sulzbacher Granger Company
194 A. 184
N.J.1937Check TreatmentThe judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Lloyd, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 8.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, JJ. 4.