History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roe Realty Company v. Sulzbacher Granger Company
194 A. 184
N.J.
1937
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Lloyd, Perskie, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 8.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, JJ. 4.

Case Details

Case Name: Roe Realty Company v. Sulzbacher Granger Company
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 22, 1937
Citation: 194 A. 184
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.