History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rodwin-Pines v. Pines
706 So. 2d 946
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1998
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

In the instant case, the appellant asks this Court to resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment was not supported by the evidence. However, the appellant’s failure to file a trial transcript renders the record inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979). Because the decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness and because the appellant has failed in her burden to demonstrate reversible error, Applegate, 377 So.2d at 1152, we affirm the judgment under review.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Rodwin-Pines v. Pines
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 11, 1998
Citation: 706 So. 2d 946
Docket Number: No. 97-2528
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.