Rodriguez v. DeStefanoRodriguez v. DeStefano
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Although Rockledge Realty Associates, LLC, doing business as ReMax Signature Real Estate (hereinafter ReMax) and Gina Coffen demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]), the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of their motion as premature (see Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v LaMattina & Assoc., Inc., 59 AD3d 578 [2009]; Ruiz v Griffin, 50 AD3d 1005, 1006 [2008]). “
The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit.
Mastro, J.P., Eng, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.