History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rodrigues v. State
52 Haw. 283
Haw.
1970
Check Treatment
Per Guriam.

Movants (Plaintiffs-Appellees), ask this court to grant a rehearing for the sole purpose of permitting them to request this court to broaden its mandate to allow the court below, on remand, to consider an issue that was never ruled upon by the lower court and that *284was never heretofore raised in this appeal. Under Rule 3(b) (3), Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii, this issue is not properly before this court, either on the appeal or on a petition for rehearing. State v. Kahua Ranch, 47 Haw. 466 (1964). Our ruling in Levy v. Kimball, 51 Haw. 540 (1970), urged in the motion, does not relieve movants from their failure to raise the issue.

Frank D. Padgett (Padgett, Greeley, Marumoto <& Akinaka of counsel) for the petition.

Motion denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Rodrigues v. State
Court Name: Hawaii Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 3, 1970
Citation: 52 Haw. 283
Docket Number: No. 4833
Court Abbreviation: Haw.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.