History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rodgers v. State
2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 148
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2007
|
Check Treatment
212 S.W.3d 200 (2007)

Robert L. RODGERS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 66737.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

January 30, 2007.

Ruth Sanders Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before THOMAS H. NEWTON, Presiding Judge, PATRICIA BRECKENRIDGE, Judge and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Rodgers appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Rodgers v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 30, 2007
Citation: 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 148
Docket Number: WD 66737
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.