History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rodearmel v. Clinton
560 U.S. 950
SCOTUS
2010
Check Treatment

On appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The District Court dismissed for lack of standing, 666 F. Supp. 2d 123, 127-131, and n. 10 (DC 2009), so it did not enter “any interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order upon the validity of the appointment and continuance in office of the Secretary of State under article I, section 6, clause 2, of the Constitution.” Joint Resolution on Compensation and Other Emoluments Attached to the Office of Secretary of State, § 1(b)(3)(A), Pub. L. 110-455, 122 Stat. 5036, note following 5 U.S.C. § 5312. The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Same case below, 666 F. Supp. 2d 123.

Case Details

Case Name: Rodearmel v. Clinton
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 7, 2010
Citation: 560 U.S. 950
Docket Number: No. 09-797
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.