History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rockett v. State
317 Ark. 430
Ark.
1994
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Appellants, Robert Rockett and Terrick Nooner, by their attorney Joe Kelly Hardin, have filed a motion for a Rule on the Clerk. The motion contends that the record in their trial was not timely filed, and the appellants should not be prejudiced, whether it was caused by clerical error or negligence of the appellants’ attorney. Their attorney does not admit fault or error in the delay of filing the record, and we deny the motion.

It is an attorney’s duty to file the record on time. In this case the record was late because an order of extension was not entered before the period for filing the record had expired. See Ark. R. App. P. 5. If the attorney will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the record was not filed on time, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. Harkness v. State, 264 Ark. 561, 572 S.W.2d 835 (1978).

Mr. Hardin is given 30 days from issuance of this order to respond. If no response is received within that time, the motion will be granted and a copy of an order granting the motion will be forwarded to the Professional Conduct Committee.

Case Details

Case Name: Rockett v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Jun 27, 1994
Citation: 317 Ark. 430
Docket Number: CR 94-578
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.