midpage

Robinson v. StateRobinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Dec 21, 1990
No. 89-03047
Versions:571 So. 2d 120
1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9599
1990 WL 211471
PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence for one count of sale of cocaine. We vacate the conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine on the authority of V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As in V.A.A. v. State, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance:

WHEN A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION IS ALLEGED BASED ON THE CRIMES OF SALE AND POSSESSION (OR POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO SELL) OF THE SAME QUANTUM OF CONTRABAND AND THE CRIMES OCCURRED AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SECTION 775.021, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP.1988), IS IT IMPROPER TO CONVICT AND SENTENCE FOR BOTH CRIMES?
SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Robinson v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 21, 1990
Citations: 571 So. 2d 120; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9599; 1990 WL 211471; No. 89-03047
Docket Number: No. 89-03047
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In