History
  • No items yet
midpage
Robinson v. Carmichael
134 Ga. 654
Ga.
1910
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

The injunction should have been granted. The ease differs

from that of Ayer v. James, 120 Ga. 578 (48 S. E. 154), and the cases therein cited, all being from courts where the dockets were not so crowded as were those of the city court of Atlanta, and where the practice óf assignment of cases was not the same. It was more, like the case of Howell v. Ware & Harper, 133 Ga. 674 (66 S. E. 884), where a proceeding, to set aside a judgment rendered by default in the city court of Atlanta, on the ground that the sudden illness of counsel had prevented him from filing a defense until the time for filing defenses had was held not io be demurrable.

Judgment re versed.

All the Justices concur. Moore & Branch, for plaintiff. Lowndes Calhoun, for defendants.

Case Details

Case Name: Robinson v. Carmichael
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 23, 1910
Citation: 134 Ga. 654
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.