History
  • No items yet
midpage
Robillard v. Robbins
78 N.Y.2d 1105
NY
1991
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

While defendants urge that it was error to allow plaintiffs medical expert to express opinions on the very questions to be resolved by the jury, their general objections were insufficient to preserve a law issue for our review (see, Matter of Gonzalez v State Liq. Auth., 30 NY2d 108, 112-113; Wightman v Campbell, 217 NY 479, 482-483).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Robillard v. Robbins
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 25, 1991
Citation: 78 N.Y.2d 1105
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.