Robertson v. Carroll Furniture Company, 7 S.E.2d 696

Robertson v. Carroll Furniture Company

7 S.E.2d 696

| Ga. Ct. App. | 1940

Check Treatment

1. The evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient to authorize a finding that if the purchase of the property was unauthorized in the first instance, the defendant, by her conduct, had estopped herself to *Page 763 deny that the property sued for was purchased for her benefit and in her behalf.

Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J.,concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 28, 1940.