73 Ala. 116 | Ala. | 1882
— The question of merit and importance in this case, that which is decisive of the rights of the parties, has been of frequent consideration and decision in this court, and we deem further discussion of it unnecessary. The legal title to the lands in controversy resides in the appellant; the proceedings in the court of probate, had at the instance of the personal representative of her ancestor, did. not operate its divestiture, as we have heretofore decided. — Robertson v. Bradford, 70 Ala. 385. The petition or application to the court of
The assignments of error relating to the objections to evidence have not been insisted on in the argument of counsel, and we regard them as waived. — 1 Brick. Dig. 102, § 285.
Affirmed.