History
  • No items yet
midpage
Robertson v. Armour Co.
129 Me. 501
Me.
1930
Check Treatment

At the close of the plaintiff’s case, the presiding Justice ordered a nonsuit. An exception to this ruling brings the case here.

The evidence- permits of but one finding. Saturday afternoon, July 28, 1928, the plaintiff’s intestate was killed when one of the defendant’s trucks on which he was riding collided with a telephone pole on South Main Street in Brewer. James E. Doucette, the driver of the truck and an employee of the defendant company, at the time of the accident was at liberty from service, using the truck for his own personal ends not within the scope of his employment. Contrary to express orders from the Company, he had invited the plaintiff and two other men to ride on the truck as his guests.

Upon these facts the defendant is not responsible for. its servant’s acts, and the question of the latter’s negligence and the due care of the plaintiff are immaterial. Exception overruled. George E. Thompson, Benjamin W. Blanchard, for plaintiff. George F. Eaton, for defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Robertson v. Armour Co.
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Dec 1, 1930
Citation: 129 Me. 501
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.