History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roberts v. State
593 P.2d 57
Nev.
1979
Check Treatment

OPINION

Per Curiam:

In the instant case, appellant contends that because police recovered a robbery victim’s property through an unlawful search, the district court erred by admitting the same into evidence. This contention clearly lacks merit. The apartment into which appellant fled following the crime, and in which police found the stolen property, was rented to another. Appellant’s status to complain of the allegedly unlawful search does not otherwise appear. Cf. Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 (1960).

Other assignments of error also are without merit.

Case Details

Case Name: Roberts v. State
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 18, 1979
Citation: 593 P.2d 57
Docket Number: No. 10423
Court Abbreviation: Nev.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.