537 So. 2d 1079 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1989
Appellant appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Several issues are raised in the motion, only one of which merits discussion. We reverse.
Appellant asserts that the State did not reveal to the appellant that another individual had confessed to the crime for which the appellant was convicted in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). The trial court ordered the state, as well as the public defender, to respond to appellant’s motion, but the trial court did not hold an evidentiary hearing. Although these responses recite facts which, if true, demon
REVERSED AND REMANDED.