midpage

Roberts v. StateRoberts v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Dec 20, 1934
24444
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Guerry
Guerry, J.

1. There was sufficient competent evidence introduced by the State from which the flight of the defendant could be inferred, and it was not error for the court to charge thereon.

*308Decided December 20, 1934. J. A. Drake, for plaintiff in error.

2. There was direct evidence of the commission of the offense charged by the defendant. The law with reference to the proof necessary in cases dependent solely on circumstantial evidence, as provided in the Penal Code (1910), § 1010, was therefore not applicable. Wilson v. State, 152 Ga. 337 (110 S. E. 8) ; Chamblee v. State, 50 Ga. App. (177 S. E. 824).

3. The evidence amply warrants the verdict of guilty. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affU‘med.

Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Roberts v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 20, 1934
Citations: 50 Ga. App. 307; 177 S.E. 825; 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 748; 24444
Docket Number: 24444
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In