History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roberts v. State
49 Ga. App. 139
Ga. Ct. App.
1934
Check Treatment
Broyles, C. J.

“In a criminal case, where the accused has exercised his statutory right to make a statement and the statement is contradictory of the testimony of the State’s witness [or witnesses], it is the duty of the trial judge, even in the absence of a written request, to instruct the jury that they have the right to believe the statement in preference to the sworn testimony.’’ (Italics ours.) Rivers v. State, 8 Ga. App. 694 (70 S. E. 47), and cit. Under the foregoing ruling and the facts of the instant case, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be and is Reversed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Roberts v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 20, 1934
Citation: 49 Ga. App. 139
Docket Number: 23864
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.