History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roberts v. Rowell
152 Ga. 97
Ga.
1921
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

There being no bona fide effort to brief the evidence in the case, the so-called brief of evidence being largely composed of objections to evidence and the argument of counsel thereon, colloquies between counsel and between counsel and the court, and various statements of the court in ruling on the admissibility of evidence, such document will not be considered as a. brief of evidence. Accordingly, this court will not review the evidence; and as no question is presented by the bill of exceptions which can be intelligently considered and passed upon without. reference to the evidence, the judgment below must be affirmed. Bishop v. Brown, 138 Ga. 738 (75 S. E. 1119), and citations.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Roberts v. Rowell
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 24, 1921
Citation: 152 Ga. 97
Docket Number: No. 2258
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.