History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roberts v. Roberts
182 Ga. 568
Ga.
1936
Check Treatment
Gilbert, Justice.

It appearing from the evidence that the transaction upon which this suit was instituted was fraudulent in its inception, and that the petitioner’s testator and the defendant were in pari delicto, equity should not interfere, but should leave the parties where it finds them. Code, § 37-112. Accordingly, the court erred in directing a verdict for the petitioner and in continuing the injunction.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Roberts v. Roberts
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 13, 1936
Citation: 182 Ga. 568
Docket Number: No. 11169
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.