History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roberts v. MAHONING COUNTY
495 F. Supp. 2d 712
N.D. Ohio
2006
Check Treatment
Docket
495 F. Supp. 2d 712 (2006)

Nathaniel ROBERTS, et al., Plaintiff(s),
v.
MAHONING COUNTY, etc., et al., Defendant(s).

No. 4:03 CV 2329.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

August 2, 2006.

Robert P. Armbruster, Armbruster, Kelley, Kot, Honeck & Baker, Akron, OH, for Plaintiffs.

Sharon K. Hackett, Linette M. Stratford, Paul J. Gains, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney, Youngstown, OH, Daniel T. Downey, Mark D. Landes, Isaac, Brant, Ledman & Teetor, Columbus, OH, Thomas N. Michaels, Cleveland, OH, for Defendants.

Thomas Kelley, Armbruster, Kelley, Kot, Honeck & Baker, Akron, OH.

BATCHELDER, DOWD and POLSTER, District Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is the motion to intervene filed by the City of Youngstown pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a)(3)(F). (Doc. No. 207). The motion is granted.

Counsel for the City of Youngstown is directed to file the Complaint in Intervention which was attached to the motion,[1]*713 taking care to use the event "Intervenor's Complaint" when making this electronic filing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTES

[1] Counsel should also be sure to file a clean copy, not the one currently attached to the motion, which contains an automatic header labeling it as Doc. No. 207-3. The ECF system will attached a new header once the new document is filed.

Case Details

Case Name: Roberts v. MAHONING COUNTY
Court Name: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Date Published: Aug 2, 2006
Citation: 495 F. Supp. 2d 712
Docket Number: 4:03 CV 2329
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.