97 P. 671 | Cal. | 1908
Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and against the defendants in 1897. Jurisdiction of the defendants was obtained by publication of summons. Eight years after the entry of the judgment the trial court set it aside upon the ground that the facts set out in the affidavit for the order of publication did not show the due diligence required by section
The affidavit for publication of summons in this case contained all that was embraced in the affidavit considered by this court in Rue v. Quinn,
For which reasons the order appealed from is reversed.
Angellotti, J., Lorigan, J., Sloss, J., and Shaw, J., concurred.