5 Ind. 542 | Ind. | 1854
Higgins brought an action in the Decatur Circuit Court, for the recovery of a tract of land. Roberts
There is no evidence in the record, and it is thought unnecessary to state the pleadings at large, as no question is presented in regard to them. .
If the appellants wished to avail themselves of any erroneous instruction given by the Court, it was their duty to have made objection before the delivery of the verdict. Had such objection been made, the Court might have corrected the error before the discharge of the jury. As such objection does not appear to have been made, any error the Court may have committed in giving the charge must be considered as waived. The case of Jones v. Van Patten, 3 Ind. R. 107, is in point.
Per Curiam.—The judgment is affirmed with costs.