Roberts v. City of Orange
102 N.J.L. 721
| N.J. | 1926

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the foregoing opinion.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None. *Page 724