Roberts v. City of Orange

133 A. 418 | N.J. | 1926

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the foregoing opinion.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.