History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roberts v. Bennett
135 F. 748
2d Cir.
1904
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Although the bill of exceptions was not allowed and signed during the term in which the judgment was rendered, and no extension of time beyond the term had been given by the court or the consent of the parties, we think the delay was excused by the illness of the judge before whom the action was tried, and his consequent inability to settle the bill, and that the “extraordinary circumstances” withdraw the case from the operation of the general rule. Koewing v. Wilder, 126 Fed. 472, 61 C. C. A. 312.

The motion to set aside the bill of exceptions is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: Roberts v. Bennett
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Nov 16, 1904
Citation: 135 F. 748
Docket Number: No. 95
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.