History
  • No items yet
midpage
Robert R. Gehler v. Paul E. M. Iasigi
407 F.2d 448
3rd Cir.
1969
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has argued pro se his appeal from a judgment in the amount of $1,143.24 and an attorney’s fee of $225.00 for services rendered to him by the plaintiff as a bookkeeper and tax analyst.

The District Court affirmed the judgment of the Municipal Court in a comprehensive opinion which makes it clear that the case involved questions of fact which the Municipal Court resolved in favor of the plaintiff, a conclusion which it could not say was clearly erroneous. 6 V.I. 352.

We agree and therefore will affirm the judgment of the District Court.

Case Details

Case Name: Robert R. Gehler v. Paul E. M. Iasigi
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: Feb 6, 1969
Citation: 407 F.2d 448
Docket Number: 17384_1
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In