History
  • No items yet
midpage
Robert G. Smart v. State
2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14625
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ROBERT G. SMART,

Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-1548 STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed September 30, 2016

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit

Court for Marion County,

Anthony M. Tatti, Judge.

Robert G. Smart, Raiford, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

COHEN, J.

Because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on Smart’s motion to correct illegal sentence during the pendency of his direct appeal, we reverse the order denying the motion. [1] See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(a)(1); Padilla-Padial v. State, 152 So. 3d 51, 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014). We express no opinion on the merits of the motion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LAWSON, C.J., and PALMER, J., concur.

[1] Although the judgment and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal, the mandate did not issue until after the trial court’s ruling on the motion. See Smart v. State, 189 So. 3d 798 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

Case Details

Case Name: Robert G. Smart v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 30, 2016
Citation: 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14625
Docket Number: 5D16-1548
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.