95 N.J.L. 70 | N.J. | 1920
The .opinion of the court was delivered by
A rule to show cause was allowed in this case, upon the application of Chester L. Robak, a stockholder in the respondent association. The rule is to show cause why
11 is significant that while this section came into the legislation of this state, in the act passed December 8th, 1825, there is no case to be found in our reports where its provisions were applied to the election of business agents or managers of business- corporations.
We think this section does not apply to the appointment or election of agents of corporations. The Supreme Court has not the power to investigate the election of Leon Gerski as business agent of the defendant corporation in a summary way. The rule to show cause must therefore be discharged, with costs.
There are many cases, in our reports in which this section has been applied to the election of directors of corporations,
The rule to show cause is discharged, with costs.