No. 89-1180 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | May 8, 1990
Based on the controlling and indistinguishable authority of G.C. v. State, 560 So. 2d 1186" date_filed="1990-04-24" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="GC v. State">560 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (rehearing denied, opinion filed April 24, 1990), and D.M. v. State, 558 So. 2d 439" date_filed="1990-02-20" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="D.M. v. State">558 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), we affirm the adjudication of delinquency under review, but reduce the finding of delinquency from third-degree grand theft (§ 812.014(1), (2)(c), (4), Fla.Stat. (1987)), to the lesser offense of trespass to á conveyance (§ 810.08(1), Fla.Stat. (1987)). We certify that our decision herein conflicts with D.N. v. State, 529 So. 2d 1217" date_filed="1988-08-04" court="Fla. Dist. Ct. App." case_name="DN v. State">529 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. dismissed, 537 So.2d 568 (Fla.1988).
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.