History
  • No items yet
midpage
R.L.B. v. State
562 So. 2d 739
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1990
Check Treatment
PER curiam:

Based on the controlling and indistinguishable authority of G.C. v. State, 560 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (rehearing denied, opinion filed April 24, 1990), and D.M. v. State, 558 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), we affirm the adjudication of delinquency under review, but reduce the finding of delinquency from third-degree grand theft (§ 812.014(1), (2)(c), (4), Fla.Stat. (1987)), to the lesser offense of trespass to á conveyance (§ 810.08(1), Fla.Stat. (1987)). We certify that our decision herein conflicts with D.N. v. State, 529 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. dismissed, 537 So.2d 568 (Fla.1988).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Case Details

Case Name: R.L.B. v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 8, 1990
Citation: 562 So. 2d 739
Docket Number: No. 89-1180
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.