History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rivers v. Travelers Insurance
92 S.E.2d 818
Ga. Ct. App.
1956
Check Treatment
Nichols, J.

1. “The burden of proof is on the claimant in cases arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act to establish the fact that the employee has sustained an accidental injury such as is contemplated by the act.” Maddox v. Buice Transfer & Storage Co., 81 Ga. App. 503 (59 S. E. 2d 329). See also American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. v. Harden, 64 Ga. App. 593 (13 S. E. 2d 685).

2. “The fact that compensation was paid on the original injury does not preclude the employer and insurer from contending that the present disability [if any] did not stem from the original injury.” Roberts v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 93 Ga. App. 440 (92 S. E. 2d 51), citing Pepperell Mfg. Co. v. Mathis, 92 Ga. App. 85 (88 S. E. 2d 201).

3. “In the absence of fraud, findings of fact made by the director and approved on appeal by the full board are binding on the courts if there is any evidence to support them; and, where no error of law appears, such findings will not be disturbed on appeal.” Fleming v. Fidelity &c. Co. of New York, 89 Ga. App. 405 (1) (79 S. E. 2d 407).

4. In the present case, where the evidence was in sharp conflict as to whether the claimant was at the present time disabled, and whether any present disability from which she was then suffering was the result of the injury for which compensation had previously been paid, the award of the single director denying compensation, which was approved by the full board, was authorized by the evidence, and the judge of the superior court did not err in affirming such award.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur. Mitchell & Walters, Robert L. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error. Marshall, Greene & Neely, Edgar A. Neely, Jr., contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Rivers v. Travelers Insurance
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 24, 1956
Citation: 92 S.E.2d 818
Docket Number: 36071
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.