History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ritter v. Mason
11 Cal. 214
Cal.
1858
Check Treatment
Field, J., at the April Term, 1858, delivered the opinion of the Court

Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

The stipulations inserted in the transcript are not embodied in any statement or bill of exceptions, and form, therefore, no part of the record; and there is no certificate of the Judge or Clerk, or any admission of counsel, that the affidavits constitute the papers used on the motion to open the judgment. There is left for our consideration only the judgment roll, which discloses no error. Practice Act, section 346; Newland v. Kean, and Davis v. Stratton, January Term, 1856 ; Tates v. Buckingham, 4 Cal. 286.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ritter v. Mason
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1858
Citation: 11 Cal. 214
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.