History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ringstaff v. Evans
47 S.E.2d 838
S.C.
1948
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Fishburne, J.:

It was stipulated by counsel in this case that it should be determined by the result of the appeal in Ingram v. Bearden, S. C., 47 S. E. (2d) 833. Accordingly the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Baker, C.J., and Stukes, Tayeor and Oxner, JJ., concur.





Concurrence Opinion

Baker, C.J.

(special concurring) : The law governing this case is controlled by the decision in the case of Ingram v. Bearden, S. C., 47 S. E. (2d) 833, and by the stipulation of counsel in the present case. Therefore, although we hold the views expressed in our dissenting opinion in the Ingram case, we concur in the affirmance in the present case.

Tayeor, J., concurs.

Case Details

Case Name: Ringstaff v. Evans
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Apr 26, 1948
Citation: 47 S.E.2d 838
Docket Number: 16070
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.