Ringrose v. Bloomsburg
167 Pa. 621 | Pa. | 1895
This case depended on questions of fact, — arising out of the testimony, — which were for the exclusive determination of the jury. They were fairly submitted to them with instructions which were fully adequate and at the same time free from substantial error.
The only subject of complaint is the refusal of the learned judge to withdraw the case from the jury by binding instructions to find for the defendant. To have done that would have been manifest error.
Judgment affirmed.