Riley v. GoordRiley v. Goord
- Reporters:
- ,
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officers involved in the investigation and the confidential information viewed by the Hearing Officer in camera, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Bankston v Selsky, 301 AD2d 984, 985 [2003]; Matter of Ruiz v Goord, 289 AD2d 810, 810 [2001]). Contrary to petitioner‘s claim, he was not improperly denied the right to call his wife and another female as witnesses at the hearing as both were incarcerated on criminal charges related to the incident in question and were the subjects of an ongoing investigation. Under the circumstances presented, having them
Peters, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.