Riguzzi v. DinapoliRiguzzi v. Dinapoli
Petitioner, a police officer for the Westchester County Depart
As substantial evidence supports respondent’s determination that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing her light duty assignment, we confirm.1 Petitioner’s assignment was administrative in nature and, contrary to her contention, respondent appropriately determined that her duties did not include single-handedly restraining any members of the public who became combative in the division’s office (see Matter of O’Halpin v New York State Comptroller, 12 AD3d 771, 772 [2004], lv denied 5 NY3d 702 [2005]; Matter of Glaski v Regan, 115 AD2d 111, 111-112 [1985]). Respondent was further free to credit the opinion of an orthopedic surgeon who examined petitioner and found her to be fully capable of performing her actual duties (see Matter of Riguzzi v Hevesi, 16 AD3d 822, 823 [2005]; Matter of Field v Regan, 90 AD2d 580 [1982], lv denied 58 NY2d 608 [1983]).
Spain, J.P., Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.