75 Tenn. 475 | Tenn. | 1881
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff in error was indicted, and convicted, for that he did, within one mile of Union Camp
It is next insisted that the indictment should have •specified the article sold, because the general words “other articles of traffic” should be restricted to articles of like nature to those enumerated before, and ought therefore to be named, so that the court can
Affirm the judgment.